---
title: "Python Engineer, AI Coding Agent Evaluator"
company: "G2i Inc."
company_url: "https://www.remjobs.works/companies/g2i-inc"
url: "https://www.remjobs.works/job/g2i-inc-python-engineer-ai-coding-agent-evaluator-491dd373-a391-4e29-aa32-387e46927169"
apply_url: "https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/8c71e2fd-999c-4f95-a496-b058b6ff562a"
workplace: remote
location: "United States"
remote_scope: "United States"
employment_type: contract
seniority: mid
role: ai-machine-learning
region: united-states
skills: ["javascript", "python", "typescript"]
date_posted: 2026-09-11T16:23:31.550Z
first_seen_by_remjobs: 2026-09-15T15:13:25.974Z
---

# Python Engineer, AI Coding Agent Evaluator

**G2i Inc.** · United States

Apply: https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/8c71e2fd-999c-4f95-a496-b058b6ff562a

## About G2i Inc.

Hire world class engineers - Super fast

## About the role

#### Senior AI Interaction Evaluator (Codex / Claude Code)

**Contract | $100–$200/hour | 10–20 hrs/week | Start ASAP (through early May)**

[Check out this Loom video for more details!](https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5)

We’re looking for **highly experienced software engineer (SR+)** to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.

This is not a traditional engineering role.

You won’t be writing production code.
You’ll be evaluating something harder: **whether the model *****thinks***** like a great engineer.**

#### What This Role Actually Is

You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios — focusing on:

- Whether the response makes sense

- Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful

- Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment

- Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developerThis role is about **engineering taste** — not syntax correctness.

#### What You’ll Be Doing

- Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end-to-end

- Judge whether outputs are:Useful

- Correct (at a high level)

- Aligned with how a strong engineer would think

- Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just code

- Distinguish between different levels of response quality (e.g. what makes something a 2 vs 4)

- Provide clear, opinionated feedback on:What worked

- What didn’t

- What felt “off” or misleading

- Help define what great looks like when interacting with tools like Cursor

#### What We Mean by “Taste”

We’re specifically looking for engineers who can answer questions like:

- Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?

- Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?

- Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?

- Would this interaction build or erode trust?You should be comfortable making **subjective but rigorous judgments**.

#### Who You Are

- Staff / Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)

- Strong background in one of the below:TypeScript / JavaScript

- Python

- Hands-on experience using:OpenAI Codex

- Claude Code

- Cursor

- Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows

- Able to evaluate code without needing to fully execute or deeply review every line

- Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback

- High bar for what “good engineering” looks like

#### Nice to Have

- Experience with tools like Cursor or similar AI-first IDEs

- Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows

- Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards

#### Engagement Details

- Rate: $100–$200/hour

- Hours: ~10–20 hours/week

- Duration: Through early May (with possible extension)

- Start: ASAP

- Process:Take-home evaluation exercise

- One behavioral interview

---

Source: G2i Inc.'s own career page, read by RemJobs. Canonical HTML version: https://www.remjobs.works/job/g2i-inc-python-engineer-ai-coding-agent-evaluator-491dd373-a391-4e29-aa32-387e46927169